Okay, just a quick one! Honest. By the way, the title refers
to a recent Polish idiom I heard recently, meaning ‘not my problem’ – it literally
translates as ‘not my circus, not my monkey.” It has almost no bearing at all on
anything, but I thought it was awesome.
So: house price indices!
There is a lot of
confusion around house price indices – so I will do my best to add to that
confusion by writing this blog based on absolutely no background research
whatsoever, save for a lecture I had a few years ago, and my recent perceptions
of actual, like, reality.
I read this morning in a newspaper that house prices have
gone up, and also down (separate newspaper) and have also possibly stayed the
same (third newspaper from last week).
So why the difference? Well, I don’t really care to be
honest – they are weighted differently, have different sample sizes etc etc
blah blah blah.
HOWEVER house prices have, on average (important) gone down A LOT. And I know this because a)
I know everything and am always right, just ask my spaniel (but not my wife,
she disagrees on this point) and b) I am an RICS Registered Property Valuer, so
I can legally tell you what your house is worth, despite the fact that I can
barely even remember my lectures and accidentally burnt a lot of my lecture
notes.
Firstly, forget the fact that people completely forget about
inflation when discussing house prices, so even my spaniel can see that house
prices have dropped by a third in real terms (no one mentions this in the media,
ever). I recently tried to introduce the concept of inflation to a middle aged Chartered Surveyor I know who is very
knowledgeable about property and construction, probably more so than anyone I know, in
fact, as he is one of the few people in Britain who is both a Chartered
Architect and a Chartered Surveyor. I won’t name him here to preserve his
anonymity, so without expressly divulging his identity, let’s for the sake of
this blog post just refer to him as ‘my father’: half way through my explanation of exactly what inflation was, he accused me of inventing "voodoo economics". But I digress.
Back to my point, the important difference is this: the average price of a
property nationwide is different from the average price of a property bought
and sold.
Example: if you have 10 houses, 8 worth £100k and 2 worth £1 million, then the average house price is £280k. This in itself is meaningless, as there are no houses worth £280k AT ALL in this scenario, but then it is a sort of useful benchmark.
House prices are dictated at the margins, and average prices
based on transactions – so if every house was bought and sold then we could
base our average on the £280k figure, as an average of all the transactions that
have taken place.
But, if the lower end of the market is stagnant (which it
is), and the only houses being bought and sold are top end, eg the only housing
transaction in this scenario is one of the million pound house being sold, what
is the average house price, based on transactions, according to the indices?
(Keep up Nick Clegg). It has gone up
(a lot in this instance), despite no movement elsewhere. Now imagine the other
houses are falling in value in reality, and the figures are even more screwed.
This is an extreme example, but as a microcosm is what is
currently going on – house prices are falling, apart from a minority in London , but this is
rarely reflected in the figures.
But then again, I rent, so it’s not really my circus, or my monkey.
No comments:
Post a Comment